By River Eastwood
In 1703, Gottfried Leibniz received a letter from China containing two symbols: ⚊ (yang) and ⚋ (yin). His reaction? “Holy binary bat-signals! This changes everything.”
The I Ching’s hexagrams—those 64 stacks of broken/unbroken lines Leibniz obsessed over—were running world’s oldest object-oriented programming language:
if (line == ⚊): return 1 elif (line == ⚋): return 0 else: consult tortoise oracle # error handling
Your iPhone’s processor owes its existence to a Shang dynasty divination manual. Let that sink in.
Picture this:
Suddenly, King Wen’s 1150 BCE “changes” reveal their true nature:
A dynamical system predicting cosmic state transitions
Modern proof? Quantum error-correcting codes use exactly 64 computational basis states—matching the I Ching’s core architecture. Coincidence? Try synchronicity.
Zoom into a Mandelbrot set. Notice those self-repeating swirls? Now overlay the Early Heaven Bagua:
The match isn’t metaphorical:
Taoist sages didn’t predict chaos theory—they wore its equations as ritual robes.
Ever stir cream and see temporary vortex patterns? That’s xian tian (pre-heaven) state collapsing into hou tian (post-heaven) reality—described mathematically as:
∇×v⃗=∂ω∂t∇×v=∂t∂ω
…where ω isn’t just vorticity, but wu ji (無極) seeking tai ji (太極).
Forget periodic tables—Taoist alchemists modeled reality with 5×5 operator matrices:
Translation: Wood → Fire → Earth → Metal → Water → Wood is a permutation matrix—proving sheng (generation) cycles are literally cosmic linear algebra.
Hedge fund Renaissance Technologies’ secret sauce? Algorithms trained on:
The result: 82% prediction accuracy for market phase shifts—beating any econometric model.
The takeaway? Wall Street’s quants aren’t doing math. They’re doing computational Taoism.
Then ask: Does [your hexagram]’s binary value mod 64 correlate with today’s Dow Jones delta?
Spoiler: The answer will terrify your inner materialist.
Further Reading:
“God may not play dice, but the universe runs on yarrow stalks.”
— Apocryphal Einstein quote (probably fabricated by a Taoist bot)
(P.S. That matrix? Modeled after Joseph Needham’s Science and Civilisation in China. Some truths withstand peer review.)